University of Engineering & Management, Jaipur
Eligibility for Admission to any programme of the University will be as per the guideline prescribed by UGC, AICTE, and relevant regulatory authorities. However, the University may announce the minimum eligibility criteria from year to year basis. It shall however be notified in website of the University & notice board of the University.
Examination Rules For All Academic Programmes
SECTION-1: QUALIFYING CRITERIA FOR PASSING AND GRADES
For example, i) if a student gets two supplementary papers in first year first semester, he/she remains eligible to continue. But if he/she gets three more supplementary papers in first year second semester, his/her total number of supplementary papers becomes five (more than four) and he/she becomes ineligible to be promoted to second year.
ii) if a student gets two supplementary papers in first year first semester, and two more supplementary papers in first year second semester, his/her total number of supplementary papers remains four and he/she remains eligible to be promoted to second year.
iii) considering case (ii), if the student now cannot clear these supplementary papers in subsequent years, but does not get any more supplementary papers, he/she remains eligible to be promoted to higher years and “pass out” of the university, but he/she does not remain eligible to get the degree until all these supplementary papers are cleared.
iv) also considering case (ii) if the student in his/her second year first semester, fails to clear the two supplementary papers he/she was carrying in first year first semester, and gets one more supplementary paper his/her second year first semester, his/her total number of supplementary papers becomes five, but the student still remains eligible to be promoted till now, since in his/her upcoming second year second semester examination, he/she might clear the two supplementary papers of his/her first year second semester and might not get any new supplementary paper and become eligible for promotion, since his/her number of supplementary papers gets reduced to three (four or lesser) at the time of promotion after even semester examination results. However if this student fails to clear any of this two supplementary papers of his/her first year second semester, then even if the student does not get any new supplementary paper in his/her second year second semester, he/she becomes ineligible for promotion to third year (since his/her number of supplementary papers remains five) and has to continue from second year first semester.
v) again considering case (ii) if the student gets three new supplementary papers in second year first semester and fails to clear any supplementary paper of his/her first year first semester, the student immediately become ineligible for promotion to third year since he/she accumulates five supplementary papers in his/her odd semester examinations and cannot clear those in his/her upcoming even semester examination. Hence, he/she will be notified about that in his/her second year first semester results. However the student may continue with his/her second year second semester studies and appear for exam and try to pass in the exam papers of second year second semester and clear as many supplementary papers as possible of his/her first year second semester exams. But after his/her second year second semester, the student will have to continue in his/her second year and also clear the supplementary papers in due time.
The students of B.Tech will have to appear for one examination of SWAYAM (NPTEL) every semester, and the results of the examination will be considered similar to any other theory papers for the final grades of the student, and pass/failure in this examination will also be considered similar to any other theory examination to determine the promotion of the student to higher years of study. However, supplementary in this examination can be cleared in any semester (supplementary in odd semesters can be cleared in even semesters and vice-versa) unlike other theory papers.
(i). Percentage of Marks and Grade Table.
Percentage of Marks |
Letter Grade |
Grade Point |
90 to 100 |
O (Outstanding) |
10 |
80 to <90 |
A+ (Excellent) |
9 |
70 to <80 |
A (Very Good) |
8 |
60 to <70 |
B+ (Good) |
7 |
50 to <60 |
B (Fair) |
6 |
40 to <50 (Theory) |
C (Below Average) |
5 |
Below 40 (Theory) |
F (Fail) |
2 |
Below 50 (Practical) |
F (Fail) |
2 |
Incomplete |
I |
0 |
(ii) The Method of calculation of Semester Grade Point Average (SGPA) is as follows:
SGPA (Si) =
where Ci is the number of credits of the i th course and G i is the grade point scored by the students in the ith course.
(iii) For Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) the calculation is as under:
CGPA =
where Si is the SGPA of the ith semester and C i is the total number of credits in that semester.
(iv) The SGPA and CGPA shall be rounded off to 2 decimal points (i.e, somebody has got 7.2345, we will write 7.23 and if it is 7.2365, we will write 7.24) reported in the transcripts.
(v) CGPA will be converted into equivalent Percentage marks as given in the following formula.
The formula is: (CGPA-0.75)*10
Example: 8 CGPA= (8–0.75)*10=72.5%
B. Degree certificate distinctions will be made on the basis of CGPA in the following manner
Those who will get Grade ‘A’, ‘A+’ or O will be put in the category of First Class with Distinction. Those who will get grade B+ will be put in the category with First class with Honors’. Those who will get B will be put in the category of First Class. Those who will get ’C’ will be put in the category of Second class. These distinctions of merit will be mentioned in the degree certificate of the University of Engineering and Management, Jaipur students.
C. Coding System of Enrollment Numbering
Enrollment no of a student as will be given in the mark-sheet is explained hereunder:
Say a student’s enrollment no is 12015002001001. i.e 1(A)-2015(B)-002(C)-001(D)-001(E).
A= For general entry it is 1, For lateral entry it is 2.
B= Year of admission
C=Degree Code, i.e For MBA it is 001, for B.Tech it is 002, for BBA it is 003, for BCA it is 004, for M.Tech it is 005 etc
D=Department code of the students, i.e For CSE it is 001, for ECE it is 002, for IT, it is 003, for CE it is 004, for EE it is 005, for ME it is 006, for EEE it is 007, for BBA 008 etc
E=Serial no of a student, 001 means serial no 1 of a particular department.
Promotion/Failure in that SWAYAM/NPTEL subject will be considered similarly to other subjects for application of rules given in sub-section 3, 4 and 5 of Section 1.
SECTION-2: MARKS DISTRIBUTION AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Total marks for a subject will be 100. Out of 100, end semester examination weightage will be 70 and Continuous Assessment/evaluation weightage will be 30 i.e 70+30=100.
Total Continuous Assessment marks for a subject in a semester will be total of (i)+(ii)+(iii). Thirty percent of the total marks thus obtained i.e. (i)+(ii)+(iii) will be taken subject wise in final University semester examination marking. That means 30 marks weightage will be there for Continuous Assessment in a semester.
Marks obtained will, however, be proportioned to 70 marks. Thus if in one theory paper, a student gets, say 50 marks, it will be shown 35 marks in mark sheet.
Thus marks for theory paper of 100 marks will have total of marks obtained is A+B
Total Marks for Practical Course (Lab) = 100 Marks
Break –up of Continuous Assessment of Practical Course (Lab)
Minimum Number of Experiments to be conducted is 10. Each experiment will carry 4 marks as per the distribution given below:-
This means, there will be a total of (1.5 X 10) = 15 marks for conduct of lab experiments, (1.5 X 10) = 15 marks for laboratory report writing, (1 X 10) = 10 marks for viva-voce.
In case, number of experiments prescribed for the course is less than 10 or the number of experiments actually conducted by the department is less than 10 due to some practical constraints, then the 40 marks will be distributed accordingly ( i.e. Pro-rata basis). Also, if the number of experiments prescribed for a course is more than 10, then the said 40 marks will be distributed accordingly ( i.e. Pro-rata basis).
A student will not be eligible to sit for a particular examination paper (theory/practical) in a semester examination, if his/her attendance in the classes/laboratories held for that particular paper, is not less than 75% in a semester, and it will be considered a backlog against the a student, will be counted as a supplementary paper for application of rule 3.
SECTION-3: PROMOTION WITH BACK PAPER EXAMINATION & DEBARMENT OF READMISSION IN THE UNIVERSITY.
SECTION-4: FAILURE TO GET PROMOTION
SECTION-5: GENERAL RULES
SECTION-6: SEMESTER DURATION
SECTION-7:- INSTRUCTIONS ON PAPER-SETTING / MODERATION / EVALUATION OF EXAMINATIONS
18.1. Paper-Setter: (i) The teachers from both the University academic Department/Centres, and/or external from academic departments of other UGC recognised Universities and reputed AICTE approved colleges may be appointed.
(ii) Shall be a teacher in the subject concerned or from Industry with at least five years experience in relevant field.
18.2. Examiner: (i) Shall have teaching experience in the subject concerned at under-graduate level.
(ii) A panel of external as well as internal examiners will be made by the Board of Studies concerned (comprising internal & external members).
N.B. Ordinarily not more than 300 scripts shall be allotted to one examiner per paper.
18.3. Moderation Board: (I) A Moderation Board shall be formed for each subject by the Board of Studies concerned (having internal as well as external members) comprising internal as well as external members. The moderation board shall have a tenure of 3 years. Dean of faculty will recommended the moderation Board to President (Vice Chancellor) for approval.
(II) Functions of the Moderation Board:
(i) To ensure that a question paper has been set strictly in accordance with the syllabus and instructions given by the University covering all broad areas adequately.
(ii) To delete questions set from outside the syllabus and to make necessary substitution, if required.
(iii) To remove ambiguity in the language of a question, if any.
(iv) To moderate all the questions properly giving ample opportunity to candidates of average and exceptional capabilities.
(v) To ensure proper distribution and indication of weightage of marks for each question or parts thereof, time prescribed for the paper and to correct error/s, if any, in this regard.
(vi) To bring to the notice of the Controller of examination, lapse or omission on the part of the paper-setter, if any.
18.4. Moderation of Examination Results: (I) There shall be a Moderation Board, if need be, to moderate results of each examination and it shall consist of:
(1) Dean/s of Schools to be nominated by the Vice-Chancellor- Chairman.
(2) Head of the Department (Ex-officio).
(3) Controller of Examinations – Convener.
(II) Term of the office of the members of the Board shall be three years which may be shortened on any ground likely to affect/prejudice the confidentiality of examination results.
(III) The duties of the Board shall be as under:
(i) The Board shall scrutinise the statistics of results prepared by the tabulators and moderate the same, if need be, before the declaration/publication of results.
(ii) As a matter of policy, the candidates having shortage of upto 2% marks to pass a subject shall be given grace upto 2% marks in the subject concerned. This will be independent of the grace marks, if any, recommended by the Moderation Board.
(iii) No grace mark shall be awarded after the declaration/publication of result.
18.5. Evaluation: (I) There shall be a 2-tier system of evaluation of answer-scripts for which purpose there shall be a Examiner as appointed by the Dean in consultation with the Head of the department. Paper setter & evaluator of a paper should not be same person. Effort should be there to involve external paper setters and external evaluators. Ten percent of the evaluated paper may be re-evaluated by second evaluator. However, this is not mandatory.
(i) Chief-Examiner: It shall be the duty of the Examination department to send all the evaluated answer scripts, paper-wise, along with the markbooks received from the Examiners to the Chief Examiners alongwith a copy of the instruction for scrutiny.
It shall be the duty of the Chief Examiner to scrutinise the evaluated answer scripts according to the instruction given by the Controller of Examination. If any wide variation in evaluation is detected, she/he shall refer the matter to the Examination department for doing the needful. She/he shall conduct a check-evaluation of at least 15% of the total number of answer-books allotted to her/him. She/he will have the powers to re-evaluate any or every script allotted to her/his Examiners. But she/he shall not erase or obliterate the marks awarded by the original Examiner when she/he reassesses any script and if there is variation between her/his marks and the marks awarded by the original examiner, she/he shall clearly score off the marks awarded by the original Examiner, and award her/his own marks beside that. While scoring off the original marks the Chief Examiner shall take special care to see that the former marks are still clearly visible. If she/he finds very wide variation between her/his marks and those of original examiner, she/he shall make special mention of such cases in the final report which she/he submits to the Controller of Examination regarding the performance of each and every Examiner placed under her/him.
Besides check- evaluation of 15% of the scripts of each and every Examiner, it shall also be her/his duty to scrutinize each and every paper of all examiners under her/him.
Scrutiny does not mean re-evaluation. It means only checking up as to whether all questions have been marked, both inside and on the facing sheet of the Answer script, check-up the correctness of the totaling of marks and posting of the same in the mark book. Correction of marks effected by her/him at the time of scrutiny shall be initialed in the answer-scripts as well as in the mark-book with red ink.
(ii) Examiners: It shall be the duty of each and every Examiner to carry on evaluation of answer scripts sent to her/him according to the instructions she/he receives. Immediately on receipt of answer scripts from the University, she/he shall check up whether all the scripts as mentioned on the cover of the packet are there. Discrepancies if any, shall be reported immediately to the Controller of Examinations. She/he shall complete the evaluation within the prescribed time and return the evaluated answer scripts with the Markbook to the Examination department on or before due date.
18.6. General: (I) Special care shall be taken by the Controller of Examination, the Chief Examiner and Examiners to maintain confidentiality relating to matters of evaluation.
On completion of the scrutiny work, the Chief Examiner shall send the packets of answer scripts along with the markbooks directly to the Controller of Examination. Malpractice, if any, detected during the course of evaluation and scrutiny, has to be referred by them directly to the Controller of Examinations.
(II) Correspondence relating to Examinations shall be carried on most confidentially and all envelops containing correspondence relating to Examination shall bear the superscription “Confidential”. All correspondence to the Controller of Examinations shall be carried on in her/his personal address. No post card shall be made use of, for any correspondence relating to matters of Examination. The assignment of evaluation or anything relating to that shall not be divulged or let known in any manner to anybody. Correspondence at every stage shall be reduced to the absolute minimum. Unnecessary correspondence with the Chief Examiner or the Controller of Examination or the University shall be avoided. Special care must be taken to ensure absolute punctuality in matters relating to the schedule of evaluation, dispatch of answer-books and submission of mark-books.
(III) The External Examiners appointed for the Practical Examinations shall reach the allotted stations before the commencement of the concerned Practical examinations. Failure on the part of any external examiner to reach the allotted station on the due date & time will be reported by the concerned internal Examiner to the Controller of Examinations.
18.7. Remuneration: Chief Examiner, Paper-Setters, Moderators, Examiners, Practical examiners, Internal examiners, staff and others engaged for an examination shall be paid remuneration for examination work, which may be fixed by the Board of Management from time to time.
Chief Examiner, Members of the Moderation Board, Controller of Examinations, Paper-Setters, Moderators, Examiners, Practical examiners, Internal examiners, staff and others engaged for an examination shall endeavour to ensure utmost confidentiality and integrity at various stages of work of any examination, including paper-setting, moderation and printing of question papers, evaluation of answer scripts, any other work connected to any examination of the University, and thus uphold the sanctity and fairness of the University examinations.
The above examination rules were approved by the Board of Management of the University of Engineering & Management, Jaipur, held on 7th December, 2017 and will remain valid until amendment by the Board of Management of the University of Engineering & Management, Jaipur, or as required to be amended by UGC/AICTE/MCI or Government of Rajasthan, if any.
By order of the Board of Management of
the University of Engineering and Management, Jaipur
(Banani Chakrabarti)
Registrar
In 2023, Govt. of India, Ministry of Education has ranked UEM JAIPUR in 1st position in North-Western India through Institution’s Innovation Council.
In 2022, UEM JAIPUR has ranked in 2nd position in entire North-Western India, under the Institutions Innovation Council (IIC) by the Ministry of Education, Govt. of India.
“1st in Rajasthan State
3rd in All India (BCA & MCA Both)”
AAA+
GOLD Category with A Grade
Award-Best University with quality Education in Jaipur in the Event Global Education Achievement Awards 2023
‘GOLD BAND’ with A Grade by R World Institution Ranking
‘Govt. and Private Institutions- All India Ranks – 32
Top Private Institutions- All India Ranks- 26
1st in Rajasthan and 10th in Entire North India
In 2022, UEM JAIPUR has been ranked as the “Most Promising University” by Atal Ranking of Institutions on Innovation Achievements – ARIIA rankings, the 2nd most prestigious rankings by Ministry of Education, Govt. of India.